I got one of those "change in terms" letters in the mail from the bank that owns one of my big-box store credit cards. As I was walking over to throw it in the recycle bag, I noticed that the spanish translation of it had one more paragraph than the english version. So, with my minimal Spanish-fluency equivalency ability, I tried to figure out what it said. And I did it! And I'm surprised by what it says, but at the same time, I want to start using it on any Spanish-translations that we have to do for work. Here's what it said (I have no idea how to make my computer type in Spanish, so please pardon my leaving off all of the accents or whatever - you'll still get the point, I think):
La traduccion al espanol de este documento sirve unicamente como referencia. De haber alguna discrepancia entre este traduccion y el documento original en ingles, se usara la version en ingles.
Now, if you read Spanish, wonderful, you're all caught up. If not, let me give you my rough translation: The Spanish translation of this document serves only as a reference. If there are any discrepancies between this document and the original in English, use the version in English.
So, my question and the source of my slight amazement is the fact that, if you can't read in English, how the fuck are you supposed to be able to tell if there are any discrepancies? You would do what I just did, and see that the approximately-the-same sized paragraphs match up along the documents, and the same paragraphs are emboldened, you'd see that the dates and amounts and numbers all match between the two, and you would move on. And really, That's all I read in English anyway - what are late fees being raised by, and for what amount of balance, and when is this happening. Those are pretty much numbers and a few big, bold words. I didn't read a lick of the text on this letter. So I guess it doesn't really matter if you can't read the English version, as long as you can check that they both have the same numbers and all that, but still. And yet, as I said, when we do public notice documents at work, and they have to be translated in Spanish, I want to start adding this language to those documents. I'm such an effing lawyer. Eeew.
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Atlantic Records: The House that Ahmet Built
This was an installment of American Masters that I caught on PBS a month or so ago, and which has stuck with me ever since. I missed the beginning, but I caught the last hour and fifteen minutes or so, just by chance as I was flipping past and finally saw something on television that was actually about music. I need to re-watch it from the beginning. I don't have much love for major record labels these days, but I respect that you needed them to make things happen back in the day. Without proper recording and distribution, not to mention the networking and marketing that labels provided back in the day, we wouldn't have the music that we have today. Just for up-and-coming artists to be exposed to other artists - it served an important role that the internet has now come to replace in spades. Anyway, this was an absolutely excellent documentary about Ahmet Ertegun, the co-founder of Atlantic Records in 1947. He was one of the rare breed, then as much as now I'm sad to say, that was really and truly into it for the music. Because of that, he drew so much real and amazing talent to that label, at such an important time in music history. He was personally responsible for getting Eric Clapton into the studio with Aretha Franklin. He negotiated the deal that brought the Stones indie label into contract with Atlantic, even though it paid them less dough than what they could've had with some other labels - because everyone involved cared more about the music than the cash. He "discovered" Led Zeppelin. He wrote Mess Around for Ray Charles. I mean, the man is responsible for SO MANY amazing things that have happened in music history, and this documentary about him and Atlantic Records was really, really well done and really interesting. If you're looking to watch something engaging, about some really pivotal moments in music recording history, or just interested in learning some more about a genuine, great guy who truly cared about the music and about making some amazing music happen, definitely check this out.
Monday, November 15, 2010
1/2 way through book review - Life by Keith Richards
This is one of those books where I can't stop thinking about it, and I even want to be sitting at the computer as I'm reading it, in order to look up and learn more about what I'm reading. And it's all I want to talk about, much to the chagrin of those around me. And I'm only about 1/2 way through. And part of me doesn't want it to end. So that's why I have this blog.
One day last week, I woke up from the weirdest dream about the Stones, and about Keith in particular. I'm SO not getting into that right now, but suffice it to say, Gimme Shelter was stuck in my head when I woke up that morning. I was in the middle of reading The American by Martin Booth at the time, but over the course of listening to the Stones all day at work, I quickly decided that I wouldn't be reading that anymore, because Keith Richards' new autobiography, Life, had been subliminally working its way into my dreams, screaming to be read. It had been on my shelf for only about three days before this happened. Severe. And there's a reason: it's SO GOOD.
Seriously, though, I'm awestruck by the depth and passion of Keith's love of music. And I know that he's an artist and a songwriter, but I'm also loving the way that he expresses himself. The writing is so conversational that I sometimes find the book hard to put down. He goes off on these tangents and asides, and it's just wonderful to read. From the very start, I've been rebuilding the roots of my appreciation for music through this book. Most of what I've been looking up as I read has been some of the music that he cites as influences, and I've been ordering CDs from the library like mad this week. Jimmy Reed. Chuck Berry. John Lee Hooker. B.B. King. I've been listening to the Muddy Waters albums that I already owned a lot, and to Big Al Carson covering a lot of classic blues. Blues and R&B has pretty much been my MO for the past week. And lots of the Stones, of course.
I've said before how much I think knowing the background to what you're listening to gives you a whole new appreciation, and this is like that on crack. I even like the Stones a ton more now that I ever used to, which was bound to happen, but I was already a pretty big fan. I've always been a fan, but this is ridiculous. Did you know Keith wrote the main structure of "Satisfaction" in his sleep? Literally. He used to sleep with his guitar and with a tape deck by his bed, and he woke up in the morning to see the tape was full - played it back and there was "Satisfaction" plus about 40 minutes of him snoring. I also just learned the background to "Ruby Tuesday," and now that song kind of breaks my heart. And the pictures in the book are great. Turns out Keith was pretty hot back in the day. Maybe that's just me.
I don't know. This is me just about half way through reading this brick of a book. And while I'm finding it hard to put down and I just want to devour the whole thing, I also don't really want it to end. More to come when I finally finish it.
One day last week, I woke up from the weirdest dream about the Stones, and about Keith in particular. I'm SO not getting into that right now, but suffice it to say, Gimme Shelter was stuck in my head when I woke up that morning. I was in the middle of reading The American by Martin Booth at the time, but over the course of listening to the Stones all day at work, I quickly decided that I wouldn't be reading that anymore, because Keith Richards' new autobiography, Life, had been subliminally working its way into my dreams, screaming to be read. It had been on my shelf for only about three days before this happened. Severe. And there's a reason: it's SO GOOD.
Seriously, though, I'm awestruck by the depth and passion of Keith's love of music. And I know that he's an artist and a songwriter, but I'm also loving the way that he expresses himself. The writing is so conversational that I sometimes find the book hard to put down. He goes off on these tangents and asides, and it's just wonderful to read. From the very start, I've been rebuilding the roots of my appreciation for music through this book. Most of what I've been looking up as I read has been some of the music that he cites as influences, and I've been ordering CDs from the library like mad this week. Jimmy Reed. Chuck Berry. John Lee Hooker. B.B. King. I've been listening to the Muddy Waters albums that I already owned a lot, and to Big Al Carson covering a lot of classic blues. Blues and R&B has pretty much been my MO for the past week. And lots of the Stones, of course.
I've said before how much I think knowing the background to what you're listening to gives you a whole new appreciation, and this is like that on crack. I even like the Stones a ton more now that I ever used to, which was bound to happen, but I was already a pretty big fan. I've always been a fan, but this is ridiculous. Did you know Keith wrote the main structure of "Satisfaction" in his sleep? Literally. He used to sleep with his guitar and with a tape deck by his bed, and he woke up in the morning to see the tape was full - played it back and there was "Satisfaction" plus about 40 minutes of him snoring. I also just learned the background to "Ruby Tuesday," and now that song kind of breaks my heart. And the pictures in the book are great. Turns out Keith was pretty hot back in the day. Maybe that's just me.
I don't know. This is me just about half way through reading this brick of a book. And while I'm finding it hard to put down and I just want to devour the whole thing, I also don't really want it to end. More to come when I finally finish it.
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
The infamous religion quiz
I think most people have probably heard about the religion quiz set up by the Pew Forum that the majority of Americans failed, and which showed that Athiests and Agnostics seem to know the more about the various religions of the world than most people who practice an organized religion, and that Catholics know the least among various groups. Not a surprise, if you ask me.
None of it is a surprise to me, really. I feel like Athiests and Agnostics tend to reach the decision to believe as they do after a lot of consideration. Religions came to exist for a reason, and to walk away from believing in any faith at all is not a decision that I think anyone could make lightly. So I feel like people who have no faith in any higher being, or who believe in something, but they're not quite sure what, tend to have weighed their options within existing belief systems before getting there. I will keep my opinions on the Catholic church to myself.
It's 32 questions long, and I strongly encourage everyone to take it and see where you fall. Here's the link.
And here's a summary of the average results:
Americans overall: 16/32 correct
Athiests/Agnostics: 20.9/32 correct
Jews: 20.5/32 correct
Mormons: 20.3/32 correct
Protestants: 16/32 correct
Catholics: 14.7/32
For the record, I got 29/32 correct.
None of it is a surprise to me, really. I feel like Athiests and Agnostics tend to reach the decision to believe as they do after a lot of consideration. Religions came to exist for a reason, and to walk away from believing in any faith at all is not a decision that I think anyone could make lightly. So I feel like people who have no faith in any higher being, or who believe in something, but they're not quite sure what, tend to have weighed their options within existing belief systems before getting there. I will keep my opinions on the Catholic church to myself.
It's 32 questions long, and I strongly encourage everyone to take it and see where you fall. Here's the link.
And here's a summary of the average results:
Americans overall: 16/32 correct
Athiests/Agnostics: 20.9/32 correct
Jews: 20.5/32 correct
Mormons: 20.3/32 correct
Protestants: 16/32 correct
Catholics: 14.7/32
For the record, I got 29/32 correct.
Tags of the week! 10-20-10 edition
Yay! It's been SO LONG since I did this! These are definitely not all radio songs, but they're all worth checking out. Without further ado, here are my top 5 today:
1) Mumford & Sons: Little Lion Man
The first time I ever heard this song, it was stuck in my head for four days. I adore it. Check out the whole album - Sigh No More - it's all good stuff. Something about a banjo and an upright bass . . . it's part folky Irish coffee shop feeling, and part downhome bluegrass jam session, but all awesome.
2) Florence and the Machine - Dog Days Are Over
This is another one where I chose the radio song, but the whole album really is excellent. Her voice is so rad, and the songs are so catchy. This is like the rockin' version of that chick Adele. Love.
3) Seether - Careless Whisper
Dude, I like the Wham version of this song, okay? And I love Seether. I think they did a great job on this. Maybe better than the original. Not Johnny-Cash-doing-Hurt better than the original, but real, real good.
And while we're talking about covering old 80's songs:
4) Chris Cornell - Billie Jean
I actually haven't researched where this came from at all, if you can believe that. J found it and played it for me, and I almost had a heart attack. I could listen to this man sing all. day. long. Nevermind acoustic and covering an MJ classic. Alien Ant Farm did an AMAZING job on Smooth Criminal a few years back, too. Check that out, whenever you have a chance.
5) The Black Keys - Chop And Change
This was a toss up between this song, which I heard on the Twilight: Eclipse soundtrack or The Black Keys' Tighten Up, which is a tagged radio song in my phone. They're just a really rad band. Kind of southern funky. I dig their bass lines.
There's gonna be more music recs coming soon. I have so much new stuff that I'm into right now. On the off chance that you're in the market for something completely different - check out Sigur Ros. They're Icelandic, and they sing in either Icelandic or this other language that they created. My high school intern introduced me to them, and I can't thank her enough. It makes awesome working or driving background.
1) Mumford & Sons: Little Lion Man
The first time I ever heard this song, it was stuck in my head for four days. I adore it. Check out the whole album - Sigh No More - it's all good stuff. Something about a banjo and an upright bass . . . it's part folky Irish coffee shop feeling, and part downhome bluegrass jam session, but all awesome.
2) Florence and the Machine - Dog Days Are Over
This is another one where I chose the radio song, but the whole album really is excellent. Her voice is so rad, and the songs are so catchy. This is like the rockin' version of that chick Adele. Love.
3) Seether - Careless Whisper
Dude, I like the Wham version of this song, okay? And I love Seether. I think they did a great job on this. Maybe better than the original. Not Johnny-Cash-doing-Hurt better than the original, but real, real good.
And while we're talking about covering old 80's songs:
4) Chris Cornell - Billie Jean
I actually haven't researched where this came from at all, if you can believe that. J found it and played it for me, and I almost had a heart attack. I could listen to this man sing all. day. long. Nevermind acoustic and covering an MJ classic. Alien Ant Farm did an AMAZING job on Smooth Criminal a few years back, too. Check that out, whenever you have a chance.
5) The Black Keys - Chop And Change
This was a toss up between this song, which I heard on the Twilight: Eclipse soundtrack or The Black Keys' Tighten Up, which is a tagged radio song in my phone. They're just a really rad band. Kind of southern funky. I dig their bass lines.
There's gonna be more music recs coming soon. I have so much new stuff that I'm into right now. On the off chance that you're in the market for something completely different - check out Sigur Ros. They're Icelandic, and they sing in either Icelandic or this other language that they created. My high school intern introduced me to them, and I can't thank her enough. It makes awesome working or driving background.
Friday, October 15, 2010
Whoops! Clearly, something needs to be done about my mobile blogging functionality! This post was supposed to say:
Instant cake and muffin mixes are our gift from the WW2 generation. Powdered milk, powdered butter, powered eggs, and flour - all in one convenient package? Just add water? Yes, please.
Instant cake and muffin mixes are our gift from the WW2 generation. Powdered milk, powdered butter, powered eggs, and flour - all in one convenient package? Just add water? Yes, please.
Thursday, September 30, 2010
It's that time of year again!
This is my second year participating in the In2Books program. In case you missed my post about it last year, In2Books is an internet-supported, curriculum-based reading mentor program. "What what what?" you say - translation: it's a program wherein you're partnered with elementary school kids, you read books with them and then you discuss by email. And it's awesome.
Click the link to read more about it straight from the source, but I can tell you firsthand, it's a really rewarding program. Last year, my pen pal was a 3rd grade girl from the Seattle area. I had so much fun getting to know her and hearing about what was going on in her life, all while seeing how excited she was about the books we were reading and about having a grown-up in a whole other part of the country who was really excited to be reading with her. As the school year went on, some other pen-pals in her class had "dropped out" and stopped responding to their students' letters (seriously? Who does this? These amazing kids are so excited to write to you, and you just fail to write back? There's no excuse - if you can't stay involved, don't sign up, but at least tell the kids that something has come up and you can't keep writing to them), so the class needed more mentors. I took on a second student for the last unit of the year, and it was even cooler to discuss the book with two completely different kids and see their different takes on the subject. The teacher in the class sent occasional emails to let the mentors know what was going on in the classroom, and he was really nice and seemed SO into what the class was doing with this program. I had such a great experience, I sent the class a gift at the end of the year - 4 books for the classroom/school library, or for the teacher to do whatever he saw fit with, and a little grab bag for each student with a book mark, book plate, pencils, an eraser, and some candy. They were stoked, and I hope to be able to do the same thing each year that I'm involved in the program.
This year, I opted to get paired with a new student rather than sticking with the same girl as last year, though I'm pretty sure that was an option. My pen pal this year is a 5th grade boy, but I'm still not sure where he's from. We just got paired up last week, and I've only gotten one letter from him so far. I just found out the first book he's chosen, and I'm picking it up from the library this weekend. I can't stress enough how cool I think this program is. Childhood literacy has become sort of a key issue for me, and whatever I can do to help get books into kids hands is SO important to me. I was blessed to grow up in a reading family, and I think it made all the difference in my life, in terms of my learning ability, my absolute love of learning, and my ability and desire to go as far and do as well in school as I did. In2Books is always looking for new mentors, and they haven't finished pairing people up for this school year, so it's not too late to sign up. There's a nominal $5 or $6 fee to pay for the cost of a background check, and the only time commitment is to read 5 kids books over the course of the school year, and exchange at least one email per book with your pen-pal.
Seriously, go to their website and check it out. Consider signing up as a mentor. You can thank me later.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







